https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7046
--- Comment #6 from Aditya Ambadkar <arambadk@xxxxxxxx> 2012-06-07 16:32:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> These changes introduced (or made worse) a static overrun (detected as Coverty
> ID 703472): there are two places where dissect_subtlv_interface_parameters() is
> called with 2 different interface_params_header_fields[] parameters but this
> patch only added the flow label changes to the first. In the 2nd case if a
> flow label parameter is detected it could access entries 36, 37, and 38 of the
> passed in interface_params_header_fields[] (which don't exist):
>
> 2871 case FEC_VC_INTERFACEPARAM_FLOWLABEL:
> 2872 proto_item_append_text(ti,": Flow Label for Pseudowire");
> 2873 proto_tree_add_item(vcintparam_tree, *interface_parameters_hf[36],
> tvb, offset+2, 1, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
> 2874 proto_tree_add_item(vcintparam_tree, *interface_parameters_hf[37],
> tvb, offset+2, 1, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
> 2875 proto_tree_add_item(vcintparam_tree, *interface_parameters_hf[38],
> tvb, offset+2, 2, ENC_BIG_ENDIAN);
>
> I could mechanically add a few entries, but do you know this protocol well
> enough to make a more informed fix?
Hey Jeff, i can take a look at it. can you give me some details on the issue so
that i can test the fix?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
