https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7310
--- Comment #9 from Niels de Vos <ndevos@xxxxxxxxxx> 2012-06-01 09:31:58 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
...snip...
> The problem is that proto_tree_add_bits_item does not display the bits the same
> way as proto_tree_add_bitmask. So either you use proto_tree_add_bits_item for
> all flags, or you continue the way you do.
Thanks for the explanation! I think I prefer to keep it the way it currently
is. This matches other parts that use proto_tree_add_bitmask() too. If there is
a strong preference to move it all to proto_tree_add_bits_item(), I can create
a v4 version.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
