https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7221
--- Comment #9 from Chris Maynard <christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx> 2012-05-03 07:25:59 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Well, I think we still have a generic problem here: this patch addresses one
> alignment problem by removing the alignment requirement, but we don't
> know/can't be sure there aren't other places with such alignment requirements.
>
> IOW, I think our emem APIs should, like malloc(), return memory which is
> "suitably aligned for any kind of variable" (to quote the Linux malloc() man
> page).
Should that be opened as a separate bug then?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
