https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6859
--- Comment #1 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2012-02-22 15:02:22 PST ---
Hi,
I'm not sure that I agree with the spliting of files per appplication, even if
we do havea bit of that currently, The AVP code namespace is shared per vendor
ID and most application uses AVP.s used by other applications as well.
We should probably organise the files per wendor id instead.
Unfortunatly one needs to add a "dummy"
<application id="16777251" name="3GPP S6a/S6d"
uri="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5516.txt?number=5516";>
</application>
to get the application id dissected. I'm not sure if the URI should actually
point to the XML specification where the DTD can be found wireshark does not
use it however so it does not mather. At a glance:
These looks wrong
-<avp name="MIP-FA-RK" may-encrypt="yes" vendor-id="TGPP" vendor-bit="must"
mandatory="must" code="14"> <type type-name="OctetString"/> </avp> -<avp
name="MIP-FA-RK-SPI" may-encrypt="yes" vendor-id="TGPP" vendor-bit="must"
mandatory="must" code="61"> <type type-name="Unsigned32"/> </avp>
Patches are normaly better than sending the whole file.
Committed the parts I could make out in revision 41144.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
