https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6783
--- Comment #5 from mdesharnais@xxxxxxxxxx 2012-02-01 11:50:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hi,
> As I read the RFC the header extension is per payload-type AND then a number
> is used. As there is no registration body for extension types there is a big
> risk of collisions especialy if people choses "1" as the extension number.
> That said your solution might be OK as we currently have no extensions
> registered that I know of.
> Regards
> Anders
Good to see you agreed with the patch. What is the process to incorporate it in
wireshark source code?
And, for information, from where in the RFC do you read the header extension is
per payload? For me, it is a completely separate feature.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
