Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 6448] wspython example fails

Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 01:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6448

--- Comment #11 from Anders Broman <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-10-14 01:16:20 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created an attachment (id=7239)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7239) [details]
> Add python-only symbols to def:sym filter
> This patch adds the symbols to a filter expression, and should remove them if
> you
> are building without python.
> I also have 4 more cumulative patches.  Is it preferable to attach them here,
> or post to wireshark-dev, or do something else with them?
> (My initial questions on wireshark-dev got no response whatsoever..)

You can post them here, I suspect that the lack of response is due to that no
one is using wspython or feel that they don't know enough about it to give an
answer. The inclusion is marked as experimental after all. I for one have no
knowledge on the wspyton code nor any great intrest of diving into it. I just
chose to apply the patches to move things along and I think that at least the
example code should execute. I also think yo deserve some sort of answer ;)

I'll look at any subsequent paches as time allows and may apply them if they
look sane to me with my non existing knowledge about this corner of wireshark.
I'd much prefer for some one with interest in the pyton binding to do it
though.
Regards
Anders

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.