https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5932
--- Comment #16 from Jim Aragon <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-05-21 16:26:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Start wireshark from a shell. Then you should see the debug output in the shell
> (I think it is called cmd in Windows). Can you start capturing the traffic
> using
> the capture filter and provide the debug output?
I don't know how to direct the conole log output to a file, so uploaded a
screen shot.
> On my machine the output contains (in the middle):
[0]: /Users/tuexen/Documents/wireshark/trunk/dumpcap
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[1]: -n
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[2]: -i
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[3]: en0
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[4]: -f
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[5]: ip host 192.168.1.61
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[6]: -y
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[7]: EN10MB
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[8]: -Z
> 22:26:51 Capture Dbg argv[9]: none
> 22:26:51 Main Dbg Callback: capture prepared
> This is what I'm interested in: Is your capture filter provided to dumpcap (in
> the -f option)?
As you'll see from the screenshot, no it isn't. My capture filter was "icmp".
"-f" and "icmp" are not passed as arguments.
Jim
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
