https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5500
--- Comment #4 from Naoyoshi Ueda <piyomaru3141@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-27 02:04:05 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=5802)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5802)
Patch to avoid the error
Hi,
The problem seems to be caused by calling proto_tree_move_item() with
faked proto_item as its argument.
During the first run through dissection phase, proto_tree_add_item()
just returns faked proto_item instead of actually creating new proto_item
and returning it. And faked proto_items make the assertion to fail.
On the other hand, after the run through dissection, proto_tree_add_item()
returns real proto_item, so the error message appears only in the packet list
and
actual decoding is performed properly.
If you look at the revision history of proto.c
(http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/trunk/epan/proto.c),
there were the following lines on the top of proto_tree_move_item()
before than revision 32443 and this seems to have prevented faked item
from causing trouble.
/* This function doesn't generate any values. It only reorganizes the
prococol tree
* so we can bail out immediately if it isn't visible. */
if (!tree || !PTREE_DATA(tree)->visible)
return;
Actually, I compiled revision 32442 and 32443, and confirmed only rev.32443
displayed
the error message.
Such being the case, I think reviving the above code is the most
straightforward way, but
I'm not sure because I don't fully understand the intent of the changes made in
rev.32443.
Anyway, I attach the patch that just avoiding the issue on the packet-isakmp.c
side by
suppressing proto_tree_move_item() call in the run through dissection.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
