https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5602
Summary: New Dissector: Locator/ID Separation Protocol
Product: Wireshark
Version: SVN
Platform: All
URL: http://lisp.cba.upc.edu/wireshark/
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Enhancement
Priority: Low
Component: Wireshark
AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
ReportedBy: ljakab@xxxxxxxxxx
Loránd Jakab <ljakab@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #5757| |review_for_checkin?
Flag| |
Created an attachment (id=5757)
--> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5757)
LISP data packet dissector patch
Build Information:
Paste the COMPLETE build information from "Help->About Wireshark", "wireshark
-v", or "tshark -v".
--
The Locator/ID Separation Protocol [1] is being standardized within the IETF,
and it is nearing RFC status (pending security review). I have been maintaining
a dissector patch for about 9 months, see [2]. Feedback received indicates that
it is widely used by the developers of a large router vendor, without issues.
It would be great if could be included into the official Wireshark
distribution.
The patch I am attaching here is for dissecting LISP data packets. This code is
mature and complete. The patch included on my web site implements control
packet decoding as well, but that is incomplete, and I would like to polish
some aspects of the code before submitting. Nevertheless, including data packet
dissection alone (and doing it early) has value, IMHO.
o checkAPIs: PASS
o Fuzz testing: PASS (2500 passes)
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp
[2] http://lisp.cba.upc.edu/wireshark/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
