https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4014
--- Comment #17 from Sake <sake@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-09-14 14:22:19 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > I think the info column gets a bit messy with this info.
>
> How about we remove some of the characters to change it from:
>
> (id=0x412b, seq(be/le)=1/256, ttl=64)
>
> To
>
> id=0x412b, seq=1/256, ttl=64
+1 for me :-)
> Is the ID of the ICMP packet important enough to display in the info column? I
> agree about the showing sequence and ttl and possibly other things that a ping
> command shows once it's supported such as response time.
I would vote yes to that question. You can quickly see in the info column which
packets belong to one-another when mutiple pings are in the trace. To me the
representation is unimportant, as long as it's consistent. It does not have a
numerical significance (to me).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
