Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 4454] New: Wants to contribute a new dissector for Wiresha

Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:59:09 -0800 (PST)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4454

           Summary: Wants to contribute a new dissector for Wireshark
           Product: Wireshark
           Version: 1.0.10
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: Low
         Component: Wireshark
        AssignedTo: wireshark-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: varun.gupta@xxxxxxxxxxx


Build Information:
TShark 1.0.10

Copyright 1998-2009 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> and contributors.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Compiled with GLib 2.14.6, with WinPcap (version unknown), with libz 1.2.3,
without POSIX capabilities, with libpcre 7.0, with SMI 0.4.8, with ADNS, with
Lua 5.1, with GnuTLS 2.6.3, with Gcrypt 1.4.3, with MIT Kerberos.

Running on Windows XP Service Pack 2, build 2600, without WinPcap.

Built using Microsoft Visual C++ 8.0 build 50727
--
I have written a new dissector for wireshark, which follows 3gpp2
spec:X.P0059-200-0_v1.0_V&V_Due_7-December-2009 Section 9.1.1.2 .

Link to the Spec:
http://www.3gpp2.org/public_html/Misc/X.P0059-200-0_v1.0_V&V_Due_7-December-2009.pdf

I would like this to become a part of standard wireshark package.
Please let me know how I need to progress on this.

The new 2 dissector files that I have written are attached.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.