Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 3469] wireshark doesn't interpret "adsl" interface in snoo

Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3469





--- Comment #5 from Sake <sake@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-25 10:32:28 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> 
> What kind of ADSL config are you using?
> It's bridged mode (without PPP):
> rgracioli@homeoffice-> get config | in adsl
> set interface adsl2/0 phy operating-mode auto
> set interface "adsl2/0" pvc 0 34 mux llc protocol bridged qos ubr zone
> "Untrust"
> set interface adsl2/0 ip x.x.x.x
> set interface adsl2/0 route
> set interface adsl2/0 dhcp client enable

OK, that explains :-)

So, snoop output will have a Linklayer type of either ethernet (bridged mode)
or PPP (PPPoA or PPPoE mode). Are there any other Linklayer types possible? If
not, I will write some heuristics code that looks at the packet data to
determine what LinkLayer type to use for each frame.


> > I wrote and tested the NetScreen snoop code against a NS-5GT-ADSL with a PPPoA
> > config, which uses PPP as link layer for the ADSL interface.
> 
> Thanks for the reply, I work for Juniper in customer support (JTAC) and I
> appreciate the effort to support decoding of snoop output!

Hi Rafael, we have had some cases together (I work for ion-ip). Actually I
think you were the one introducing me to snoop on the NetScreen in one of our
cases. Glad to be able to contribute back this way ;-)  Cheers,  Sake


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.