https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3020
Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx> 2008-10-30 17:38:39 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Yes I am. I have scanned several open source projects with it:
> http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/
Ok.
> You are also mentioned there:
> http://cppcheck.wiki.sourceforge.net/found_bugs
Lucky us :). How do we get unlisted once the items found are fixed?
> It is pretty good also, e.g. assuming that I made no mistakes when checking
> these (I did check every finding manually to avoid possible extra work for
> you),
Thanks.
> cppcheck produced no false positives for your project. This is the whole output from it:
>
> $ cppcheck --recursive > ../output.txt
> [epan/dissectors/packet-giop.c:1488]: Memory leak: saved_repoid
> [epan/dissectors/packet-tacacs.c:871]: Memory leak: tacplus_data
> [gtk/follow_ssl.c:176]: Memory leak: follow_info
> [gtk/follow_udp.c:123]: Memory leak: follow_info
> [gtk/sctp_chunk_stat_dlg.c:328]: Memory leak: col_arrows
> [gtk/sctp_error_dlg.c:230]: Memory leak: col_arrows
I just downloaded the latest version of cppcheck and checked all of the files
you reported. Some of them didn't show any errors on my system. Nevertheless,
I have/am fixing each of the ones you reported along with any others that jump
out at me.
As for this bug, the leaks in packet-tacacs.c for this bug have been fixed in
SVN revision 26636. Thanks for your report!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
