Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2747] Unable to capture from other switches in stack

Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 04:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2747





--- Comment #6 from Wglastonio <wglastonio@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-08-01 04:03:16 PDT ---
Hi Mr Keuter,

Sorry, I think I was not so clear. I will try explain again. Please, take a
look in the picture (attachment).

Condition 1:
i) Snnifer is using port 3 of switch 1, for example;
ii) If I don't set a "capture filter" on the Wireshark, it captures packages
from both switch 1 and/or switch 2;
iii) If I set a "capture filter" on the Wireshark (example, port 5060), snnifer
captures packages only from switch 1, that is the same switch where is the
snnifer;
iv) If I set a "capture filter" on the Wireshark (example, port 5060), snnifer
doesn't capture any package from switch 2 (or switch 3);


Answering your last question: If I remove "capture filter" I see all packages
on the snnifer. In this case, after a capture I can use a "display filter" and
my SIP packages are there, all ok. The problem for me is because the amount of
data is too huge.


I have talked with 3-Com too. However, after several tests they requested me to
contact you, from Wireshark.


Thanks in advance and best regards,


Wglastonio.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.