ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-bugs: [Wireshark-bugs] [Bug 2681] glithes in current ssl decrypt code

Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 00:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2681


Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #1990|                            |review_for_checkin?
               Flag|                            |




--- Comment #9 from Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>  2008-07-09 00:38:17 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=1990)
 --> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1990)
Additional SSL dissector registration

While working on your patch I came across the registration of two ports as SSL
equivalents to the plain service. I'm no expert in this field, but should this
patch be applied as well? It adds HTTP and LDAP on their respective SSL ports.
I've no means of testing this, and I'm not sure if this creates conflicts.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.