http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2222
--- Comment #2 from john dite <john.dite@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-01-25 16:52:03 GMT ---
It is not the reassembly of the total packet (#7227) that I was alluding to in
my bug report, it was more the hope that Wireshark would see whether it had the
next part of the RFC1006 header in the captured portion of the frame and decode
and display this. Otherwise one gets the (false) impression that there is only
one part of the RFC1006 header included in the captured part of the frame.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
