http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2111
------- Comment #3 from oder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-30 11:52 GMT -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Could you attach a capture file that includes both of those packets so we can
> investigate further?
First of all, capture file is quite large and those packets are distant in it
so there is no sense to attach the file in whole. I have attached only fragment
around problem packet.
Second, I was debugging communication between two hosts and therefore, capture
was made with filter "src.port == 16015 || dst.port == 16015". That's why there
are not all packets present in it. However immediate predecessor and immediate
successor packets are available.
Third, I had to change some bytes in packet data to question marks to maintain
privacy. However, that should not make any obstacles for problem investigation,
I suppose.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
