http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2145
------- Comment #2 from balint.reczey@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-28 14:56 GMT -------
Hi,
Yes, there is no big difference mentioned in the history.txt, but it seems,
that there were more minor changes if we compare the source for the two
versions. :-(
I submitted that bug report, because we experienced some strange errors while
running the Windows version that we could not reproduce on Linux.
On Linux, i used Lua 5.1.2 (packaged for Debian Lenny), but on Windows, i found
that the bundled Lua version was only 5.1.
I'm not sure that the version problems were related to Lua version 5.1 and
unfortunately i cannot test whether the problems appear on Lua 5.1.2 because i
don't have access to the Windows machine currently.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi,
> From what I can see there is no big difference between 5.1 and 5.1.2
> http://luabinaries.luaforge.net/#history
> History
> [09/Apr/2007]
> Lua 5.1.2 - Release 1
> Added a dll proxy called "lua51.dll" in the dll packages. It can be used to
> replace other "lua51.dll" previously released. It will simply forward calls to
> the "lua5.1.dll". There is no compiled source code involved in the forwarding.
> [14/Mar/2007]
> Lua 5.1.1 - "luac5.1.exe" updated in the current zip to fix a problem with the
> "-l" parameter.
> [10/Nov/2006]
> Lua 5.1.1 - Release 1
>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
