http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1787
------- Comment #3 from christopher.maynard@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-27 21:04 GMT -------
Prior to SVN22825, the protocol name was actually bfdcontrol, not bfd. My
patch changed those fields to match the protocol name. However, with the
already committed patch from Todd J. Martin in September 7, 2007, the protocol
name was changed from bfdcontrol to bfd, which rendered my patch obsolete.
Luckily, Todd also changed all the protocol filter fields beginning with
bfdcontrol to bfd, so so now they all match the new PROTOABBREV of bfd.
Anyway, with Todd's patch, I think this bug can be closed.
Reference:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py/trunk/epan/dissectors/packet-bfd.c?view=log
Relevant SVN log entry:
- Change the filter name for the protocol from bfdcontrol to bfd since all of
the other display filters started with bfd.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
