http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1332
------- Comment #10 from martin.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-01-30 13:45 GMT -------
This is hopefully fixed with change 20623, please test & confirm.
The problem was that the data part of the AVP as assumed to be (AVP header
length - reported AVP length), but this didn't take into account that for RFC
IP_ADDRESS fields, that length would include 2 bytes of padding. I now
hardcode the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as 4 and 16 bytes (maybe this isn't
totally ideal, as it would be good to get an indication that the length and
padding were done properly...)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
