Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.
Wireshark logo

Smb2-protocol: Re: [Smb2-protocol] Re: Break response

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

Date Prev · Date Next · Thread Prev · Thread Next
Date Index · Thread Index · Other Months · All Mailing Lists
From: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:52:36 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

ronnie sahlberg schrieb:
> On 4/6/06, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> ronnie sahlberg schrieb:
> 
>>> shouldnt there be a flag or something in there as well that indicated
>>> whether the oplock is broken   or merely just being downgraded to a
>>> level 2 oplock ?
>> maybe, but we didn't know this details yet...
> 
> dont you have a torture test or something that tests oplocks and also
> the "downgrade to level 2" case?

not yet, sorry:-(
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFENOTkm70gjA5TCD8RAosyAJ4v4uFIrd0o5Ste79i4ZMp9R93qfACeP9RZ
xDSZBHmDDFRp8grvfNWg8OM=
=9B21
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wireshark logo footer

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube