Wireshark · Ethereal-users: Re: SV: [Ethereal-users] hardware interface

[Guy Harris <gharris@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 08:15:16PM +0200, Martin Regner wrote:
> I guess some it should be 11574 and 11572 instead.
> 
> Basic Call (64kb/s unrestricted, 3.1kHz audio and speech bearer services)
> 
>  ISO/IEC 11574
> 1994
> 
> ISO/IEC 11572
> 2nd edition 1997
> 
> 
> http://www.qsig.ie/qsig/updates/index.htm

(That site looks as if it could use a much higher-speed link, such as a
64 kb/s link; it is slow as hell, at least from this side of the pond. 
I ended up just doing Google searches for "iso 11572" and "iso 11574";
it found entries in the Google directory that linked to those standards
on the "publicly available standards" section of the ISO Web site.  See

	http://directory.google.com/Top/Science/Reference/Standards/Individual_Standards/

.)

11572 sounds like ECMA-143 and 11574 sounds like ECMA-142; if they are
similar (or the same), then my answers to the questions about
ECMA-142/143 apply also to ISO 11574/11572.