ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] to add more auth parametersto SIP dissector

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Anders Broman (AL/EAB)" <anders.broman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:20:37 +0200
Checked in. Please note that we are currently having some problems, so
the patch may not be in the public svn repo for a few days...
Brg
Anders  

-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Mathieson
Sent: den 25 maj 2006 14:35
To: Ethereal development
Subject: Re: [Ethereal-dev] [Patch] to add more auth parametersto SIP
dissector

Hi Lars,

This version of the patch won't look for the authentication scheme (it
just skips that part for Authentication-Info headers).  I tested it
using the enclosed file (pasted from the RFC and fed through
od/text2pcap, then messed around with so I could test the other new
parameters, even if they don't really belong in that header...).

Thanks and regards,
Martin




> Lars Roland wrote:
>
>> Hello Martin,
>>
>> Martin Mathieson schrieb:
>>  
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds a 3 more auth parameters, and now parses the auth 
>>> parameters in an Authentication-Info header.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin
>>>  
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Two remarks/questions :
>>
>> - The authentication-info header has a slightly different syntax as 
>> the authenticate and authorization headers. It doesn't contain a 
>> field for the authentication scheme at the beginning.
>>  We should have an own routine for dissecting the authentication-info

>> header.
>>  
>>
> Oops, yes.  Hadn't tested this part yet...
> I'll create a capture and try to post an updated patch later on.
>
>> - There is no "auts" parameter in RFC 3261. Is it defined in another 
>> SIP-Extension?
>>
>>  
>>
> It is defined in RFC 3310, and can appear in the Authorization:
header.
>
>> Regards,
>> Lars
>>  
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Ethereal-dev mailing list
> Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev