Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Patch for UDP header length

[Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Graeme Hewson wrote:

> Graeme Hewson wrote:
> > The attached patch puts out a warning if the UDP header Length field is
> > longer than it ought to be.
> >
> > Ethereal should also take account of UDP Jumbograms, as described in RFC
> > 2675, where the Length field is zero, but I haven't included support for
> > this in my patch since I don't have a sample packet.
>
> So while hidden fields get discussed, please could someone check in my
> change (which doesn't have any new code using hidden fields).  I attach
> an updated version of the patch which adds a comment about jumbograms.

Checked in.

Thanx,
Jaap