Huge thanks to our Platinum Members Endace and LiveAction,
and our Silver Member Veeam, for supporting the Wireshark Foundation and project.

Ethereal-dev: RE: [Ethereal-dev] G_malloc vs malloc

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: "Ceyhun Seran" <sceyhun@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:31:10 +0200
Hi, 
The text of the about Ethereal box is :
----------
Compiled with GTK+ 2.4.14, with GLib 2.4.7, with WinPcap (version
unknown),
with libz 1.2.3, with libpcre 6.3, with Net-SNMP 5.2.1.2, with ADNS.

Running with WinPcap version 3.1 beta4 (packet.dll version 3, 1, 0, 24),
based on libpcap version 0.8.3 on Windows 2000 Service Pack 4, build
2195.
-----------
I didn't see any crash in 0.10.13...but working a bit slowly compared to
0.10.12 while exporting. That's not important...
Regards,

Ceyhun
	




-----Original Message-----
From: ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ethereal-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: vendredi 14 octobre 2005 16:50
To: Ethereal development
Subject: RE: [Ethereal-dev] G_malloc vs malloc


Hi,

Loaded both capture files succesfully on:
---8<---
Version 0.10.11 (C) 1998-2005 Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Compiled with GTK+ 2.4.14, with GLib 2.4.7, with WinPcap (version
unknown), with libz 1.2.2, with libpcre 4.4, with Net-SNMP 5.1.2, with
ADNS.

Running with WinPcap version 3.1 (packet.dll version 3, 1, 0, 27), based
on libpcap version 0.9[.x] on Windows XP Service Pack 2, build 2600.
---8<---

Could you dump the text of the about Ethereal box here? Maybe our Win32
expert Ulf can make some sense of it. ;-)

Jaap

_______________________________________________
Ethereal-dev mailing list
Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev