Taking a deeper look the "root" node has no GUI representation, so
what I did expand the first level nodes (which are the ones shown).
Someone should take a look at the gtk1 tree. I lost most of my day
unsuccesfully trying to setup a gtk1 environment to write the gtk1
version, later I noticed that Guy had already written it.
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:04:55 +0100, LEGO <luis.ontanon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's that way because I did not think in doing so, expandig just the
> root node should be ok.
>
> On the other hand expanding all the nodes would be obnoxious as some
> might have way too many children.
>
> Luis
>
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 21:51:53 +0100, Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > > The GTK+ 2.x version doesn't automatically expand the root node; don't
> > > do so in the GTK+ 1.2[.x] version.
> > >
> > >
> > Is this because it's not possible to implement in 2.x, or simply because
> > it's implemented that way in 2.x?
> >
> > IMHO it's the right way to expand the root node, otherwise the user has
> > to do that by hand which is annoying.
> >
> > Regards, ULFL
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ethereal-dev mailing list
> > Ethereal-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.ethereal.com/mailman/listinfo/ethereal-dev
> >
>
> --
> This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
> -- Marshall McLuhan
>
--
This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself.
-- Marshall McLuhan
