Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites

ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
July 17th, 2024 | 10:00am-11:55am SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, ethereal.com. This list is no longer active.

From: didier <dgautheron@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:56:34 +0000

Hi,
ronnie sahlberg wrote:

i have checked in a fix for bug 3,
just a simple g_assert(length<0xff) which should be enough here.

What's wrong with length == 0xff?

the malloc is bogus; should be g_malloc though

Didier

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
  - From: Gerald Combs

References:
- [Ethereal-dev] [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
  - From: Bryan Fulton
- [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
  - From: Bryan Fulton
- Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
  - From: ronnie sahlberg

Prev by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
Next by Date: Re: [Ethereal-dev] plugins version-subdirectory: Why?
Previous by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
Next by thread: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Re: [Coverity] Possible Format String Vulnerabilites
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

© Wireshark Foundation · Privacy Policy

Facebook·Mastodon·Twitter·YouTube