Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] docboook Makeifle: experimental patch attached

[Ulf Lamping <ulf.lamping@xxxxxx>]

Joerg Mayer wrote:

> Ok, I just found out that the most likely reason I'm not getting any
> responses on iteration no 3 of my Makefile patch was that I forgot to
> acutally mail it to this list.
>  
Sounds reasonable ;-)

> While the chunked version may be more comfortable to read (I don't know -
> I've never understood why people generate chunked versions) 
I like the chunked version and use it "everyday".

> the single
> file version is much easier to search. 
I use the PDF to search, so there *are* different ways of usage.

> So maybe an archive should contain
> both for optimal browsing/searching experience? 
IMHO, there should be several archives for the user to choose from.

> Well, I will leave this
> discussion for later - let's get the technical stuff done first :-)
>
>  
That sounds like a good idea.

> > > Please test the current version. It it's not ok, let me know what to
> > > fix, otherwise just check it in.
> > >      
>
> dito for version 3.
>  
Checked in, I had to change:

cp graphics/* eug_html/graphics
to
cp graphics/*.* eug_html/graphics

(and similar places in the eug) as otherwise cp failed with "omitting 
toolbar directory"

and of course changed settings back to meet my build environment :-)

BTW: as you seem to be working on this (and I don't want to start 
another confusion also working there) could you rename the graphics dir 
to eug_graphics, as there seems to be no files left, that are used in 
both docs.

Regards, ULFL