Wireshark · Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Back to performance...

[Ian Schorr <ethereal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lars Roland wrote:

> Ian Schorr wrote:
>
> > Is there any reason why gtk/rpc_progs.c, gtk/h225_ras_srt.c, and 
> > gtk/h225_counter.c use reddisect_packets() instead of 
> > retap_packets()?  Noting the comment in h225_ras_srt.c, it appears 
> > someone's already made this observation about one of these files (I'm 
> > guessing Guy =).
> I don't see any reason not to replace redissect_packets() by 
> retap_packets() for the h225 taps. I just tested it with my tracefiles 
> and I do not see any problem.
> I guess it can be replaced in rpc_progs.c , too, but someone should 
> verify.
I didn't see any logical reason not to change.  Doing so definitely 
doesn't change anything for the variety of onc-rpc traces/protocols that 
I have, my opinion is that it should be changed.
Ian