Ethereal-dev: Re: [Ethereal-dev] Back to performance...

Note: This archive is from the project's previous web site, This list is no longer active.

From: Ian Schorr <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 22:38:14 -0400
Is there any reason why gtk/rpc_progs.c, gtk/h225_ras_srt.c, and gtk/h225_counter.c use reddisect_packets() instead of retap_packets()? Noting the comment in h225_ras_srt.c, it appears someone's already made this observation about one of these files (I'm guessing Guy =).
If there's no good reason can we change them please?


On Jul 23, 2004, at 7:46 PM, Guy Harris wrote:

Ian Schorr said:
In the other direction, is there any reason that the packet list needs
to be rebuilt every time a new tap listener is added or changed in some
Definitely not, at least in some cases, which is why I created
"retap_packets()" and made the tap code use it in some places - it doesn't rebuild the packet list, it just redissects the packets (and doesn't even
bother building the protocol tree if there are no tap filters).