-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 08:10 am, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Questions for copyright holders.
>
> In order to proceed with this, Ethereal's copyright holders need to
> agree on a final objective. Do we simply want ClearSight to stop
> infringement? Do we want them to open the source of Analyzer? Do we
> want damages? Should they be allowed to keep doing what they're
> doing, provided they pay a licensing fee?
I'm not interested in receiving damages money, although I would like to see
more than just an apology given the fairly deliberate actions that ClearSight
appears to be conducting.
I'm not willing to relicense my contributions / bug-fixes for Ethereal under a
non-GPL license. If you want to relicense Ethereal, all of my stuff has to
come out.
My preferred outcome is open sourcing of any product containing or embedding
GPL'd code. Whether ClearSight continues to redistribute doesn't really worry
me, as long as the redistribution is fully GPL compliant.
Brad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAUqrjGwwszQ/PZzgRAtS8AJ0S+YoZJHj8eqB8OGIXDAS0RSO6vwCfSsU/
+jTNoEeR171qkYX44HYDrv0=
=x16X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
