Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:52:14 +1100
Wireshark only discards traffic on an interface on the basis for the capture filters. There are no random discard filters (or other math-like ones that would be suitable.
If I want to simulate a lossy network, I use the "netem" functionality built into to the Linux kernel to good effect. (Basically you setup a Linux box as a bridge and then use the "tc" commands to alter the traffic control paramters of the interfaces.
Regards, Martin
MartinVisser99@xxxxxxxxx
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:17 AM, nangergong <nangergong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, all:
I captured some packets in my experiment. Is it possible to randomly discard some packets with a certain probability from the captured packets using wireshark?
Besides, does anyone know the meaning of "minus packet loss" in wireshark, as shown in the attached pktloss.jpg? Thank you!
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- From: nangergong
- Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- References:
- [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- From: nangergong
- [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] about Packet loss in wireshark
- Index(es):





