Thanks Jeff.
Regards,
NAGENDRA
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 7:02 PM
To: Community support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Any Replacement functionfor
proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden
Reddy Nagendra-GKTC37 wrote:
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> In 1.0.2 there is one function called 'proto_tree_add_boolean_hidden'.
>
> Is there any similar function 1.2.6 ?
This question is probably better aimed at the -dev list.
The _hidden APIs were all deprecated, largely because it's not a good
idea to have hidden fields from a UI perspective (if they're hidden, how
does the user know they're there?). But you can still add hidden items
by doing, for example:
item = proto_tree_add_boolean()
PROTO_ITEM_SET_HIDDEN(item)
________________________________________________________________________
___
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list
<wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
