Wireshark
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
From: Tal Bar-Or <tbaror@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:04:11 +0200
Hi,
Rechecking we don't have full /auto mismatch, but ant way here is attached chopped and reduced to 10% size cap of the slow ftp transfer.
Thanks
Rechecking we don't have full /auto mismatch, but ant way here is attached chopped and reduced to 10% size cap of the slow ftp transfer.
Thanks
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Hansang Bae <for_list_hbae@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tal Bar-Or wrote:I meant a small sample. But are you sure you didn't have a duplex
> Hi,
>
> Even with EDITCAP the trace file is stay large size 190MB and with
> zip so cant send it, so will send only the expert info images.
> BTW, i changed the nic to Intel Pro 1000 PT Dual port and the problem
> solved so we have to change nic on another 14 servers.
mismatch? or did you try updating the drivers?
--
Thanks,
Hansang
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Attachment:
slow-ftp_trans-choped.zip
Description: Zip archive
- References:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
- From: Tal Bar-Or
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
- From: Hansang Bae
- Re: [Wireshark-users] Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
- Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Sequence diagram generation from the Logs
- Next by Date: [Wireshark-users] WG: I would like to ask my following two questions:
- Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] Interface Details >Receive but no buffer ISUUE
- Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] Sequence diagram generation from the Logs
- Index(es):