Riverbed Cascade Pilot Personal Edition: Take Wireshark to the Next Level - Advanced Triggers and Alerts; Web and VoIP Analytics; Long-Term Trending and Forensics; Deep Packet Analysis with Wireshark

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] Partly functional ?

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists

Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next

From: Martin Mathieson <martin.r.mathieson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 11:46:54 +0100

I think the PDCP headers are completely parsed now.
There is only partial support for dissecting ROHC headers (much of RTP profile, not much else).

I just started working on this again yesterday, so I plan to:
- call the RRC dissector for BCH/PCH/CCH (as the MAC-LTE dissector does)
- continue to improve/expand ROHC support.

Martin

On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Karthik Balaguru <karthikbalaguru79@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I find the lines 'PDCP-LTE dissector is partly functional'

in the below link -

http://wiki.wireshark.org/PDCP-LTE

What does it mean by 'Partly Functional' ?

How much of support is present ?

Thx in advans,

Karthik Balaguru

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
mailto:wireshark-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

References:
- [Wireshark-users] Partly functional ?
  - From: Karthik Balaguru

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] text2pcap
Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] Partly functional ?
Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] Wireshark.com and 1.0.6 Download
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread