Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-users: [Wireshark-users] why Wiresharks works (and tcpdump doesn't)

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Rogelio <scubacuda@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 22:23:00 -0700

My question is not so much around Wireshark, but rather why I have to use Wireshark rather than use tcpdump to find an unknown address of a network device.

(i.e. Say I have a router, and someone gave the internal interface some stupid IP, such as 1.2.3.4. If my laptop is on the same subnet, then the command "tcpdump -i eth0 arp") finds the IP okay. But if it's not, then I don't see that IP. When I start Wireshark, however, I see the IP of the network device fly by.)

Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] why Wiresharks works (and tcpdump doesn't)
      • From: Martin Visser
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] code for reading pcap
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Display Filter "tcp.pdu.time"
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] code for reading pcap
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] why Wiresharks works (and tcpdump doesn't)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation