Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
SHARKFEST '12 - Wireshark Developer and User Conference - June 24-27, 2012 - UC Berkeley, Clark Kerr Campus
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] packet counter statistics for a dissector

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Stephen Fisher <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:58:40 -0700

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:42:35AM -0500, Jeff Morriss wrote:

> The usual cause for different behavior with and without a filter is 
> that some (necessary to operate correctly) work is being done by the 
> dissector inside an "if(tree)": 'tree' may be NULL if there's no 
> filter but it won't be if there is a filter.

.. and for thsoe who don't know, when coloring rules or custom columns 
are in use, tree != NULL.


Steve


  • References:
    • [Wireshark-users] packet counter statistics for a dissector
      • From: Toralf Förster
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] packet counter statistics for a dissector
      • From: Jeff Morriss
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] Not seeing SSL protocol packets
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] packet counter statistics for a dissector
  • Next by thread: [Wireshark-users] Timing questions
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation