Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Stephen Fisher <stephentfisher@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:36:06 -0700

This doesn't sound like a Wireshark question, but I'll answer anyway 
since I'm not busy.  Further discussion should go off list.
 
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:37:05AM -0800, jose john wrote:

>      Suppose I have a network like lapA-----Router1-----Ruoter2. Both 
>      R1 and R2 have the RIP disabled.

>  Case1: What will happen if I ping R2 from lapA

Assuming you have a default gateway set on lapA pointing to R1, the icmp 
echo will travel to R1 and then to R2 since R1 nd R2 share a common 
subnet and the "connected" route would be in the routing table.

>  Case2. What will happen if the RIP is enabled on R1 and am trying to 
>  ping R2 from lapA?

Same as above.


Steve


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping
      • From: Gerald Combs
    • [Wireshark-users] Transmission time and a doubt
      • From: jose john
  • References:
    • [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping
      • From: jose john
  • Prev by Date: [Wireshark-users] Mac OS X and spaces in the home folder path
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping
  • Previous by thread: [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] RIP vs Ping
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation