Riverbed Cascade Pilot Personal Edition: Take Wireshark to the Next Level - Advanced Triggers and Alerts; Web and VoIP Analytics; Long-Term Trending and Forensics; Deep Packet Analysis with Wireshark

Wireshark-users: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Wireshark-announce] What is a good average for malformed packets

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists

Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next

From: "Olivier Mugnier" <olivier.mugnier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:47:32 +0200

I can say less than 1 percent on a Cat5 network with good switch....

For me should'nt be upper than 2 or 3 % on a low class network (low level hub)

after, you must have one hardware defective...

Just have a look on your capture where error come from... and try changing the net card.

Olivier Mugnier

----- Original Message -----

From: Wireshark announcements

To: wireshark-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 4:18 PM

Subject: [Wireshark-announce] What is a good average for malformed packets

Hello,

Im in the process of analyzing traffic from our network and Im coming across some malformed packets. Before I start going capture crazy. What is a good (average) of malformed packets on a network?

-Albert -

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-announce mailing list
Wireshark-announce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-announce

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-users] [Wireshark-announce] What is a good average for malformed packets
  - From: Hansang Bae

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] I can not see any significant data with RTP Player
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-users] I can not see any significant data with RTP Player
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Wireshark-announce] What is a good average for malformed packets
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-users] [Wireshark-announce] What is a good average for malformed packets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread