Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:08:02 -0700

On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:59 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:

> Myself I'm still fan of forking gnulib snprintf() and naming it ws_snprintf() ;)
> 
> Later we could add new conversion specifier for addresses (IPv4, IPv6, ...), 
> thousands grouping, or other ideas from: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201206/msg00176.html

And then fork GCC and clang and enhance them to do string-vs-argument-list checking for our extensions. :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
  - From: Jakub Zawadzki

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
  - From: Evan Huus
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
  - From: Jeff Morriss
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
  - From: Evan Huus
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
  - From: Jakub Zawadzki

Prev by Date: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 1.4.15 is now available
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Passing NULL to %s format specifiers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread