Wireshark · Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?

From: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:52:04 -0700

On Oct 28, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:

> The checks will introduce more conversions from string to integer, but
> that may not be an issue?

Unless somebody has a Wireshark extension or script running TShark or something of that sort that attempts to compile millions of filters per second, it's probably not a performance issue. :-)

References:
- [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
  - From: Stig Bjørlykke
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
  - From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
  - From: Stig Bjørlykke
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
  - From: Stephen Fisher
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
  - From: Stig Bjørlykke

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 39534: /trunk/epan/wspython/ /trunk/epan/wspython/: register-dissector.py wspy_register.c
Next by Date: [Wireshark-dev] BuildBot fuzztesting
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Is "tcp.len < -1" a valid display filter?
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: [FOSDEM] Dates for FOSDEM 2012: 4 & 5 February
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread