On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:28:23PM +0200, Michael T?xen wrote:
>> Irene can take a look at this tomorrow . I guess you have a preferred capture
>> interface, right? We put this interface on the ifaces list, since
>> it is equivalent to specifying it on the command line.
>
> True:
> capture.device: eth0
>
>> The same problem should occur when you specify interfaces on the command
>> line. So ifaces is set correctly (at least as intended), I think the
>> condition is wrong.
>
> Fine. The for me important thing is, that this wasn't caused by my changes :-)
>
> Thanks!
You are welcome. Thanks for reporting the issue.
Best regards
Michael
> Joerg
> --
> Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
> mailto:wireshark-dev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>
