Hi,
>Is the second part of the patch (added inside the else clause) correct?
Looks ok, perhap an assert or g_warning as it shouldn't happen?
Thanks for cleaning things up.
Best regards
Anders
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wireshark-commits-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jmayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: den 19 maj 2011 07:45
To: wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 37282: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: tcp_graph.c
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=37282
User: jmayer
Date: 2011/05/18 10:44 PM
Log:
Fix two warning in case of UIMANAGER:
- Unused variable
- 'graph_type' may be used uninitialized
Is the second part of the patch (added inside the else clause) correct?
Directory: /trunk/gtk/
Changes Path Action
+3 -1 tcp_graph.c Modified
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits
mailto:wireshark-commits-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
