Wireshark

  • Riverbed Technology
  • WinPcap
the world's foremost network protocol analyzer
  • Wireshark
    • About
    • Download
    • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Ask a Question
    • FAQs
    • Documentation
    • Mailing Lists
    • Online Tools
    • Wiki
    • Bug Tracker
  • Develop
    • Get Involved
    • Developer's Guide
    • Browse the Code
    • Latest Builds

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wi reshark 1.0.2win32installer

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists
Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next


From: Gerald Combs <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:08:35 -0600

On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 11:29:54 +0200, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> That was talk about c-ares as replacement for adns. It came out on top of
> my
> preference list (further candidates: UDNS and posadis). I have had no
time
> to
> investigate this any further, let alone start design/implementation.

It looks like the c-ares community reacted pretty quickly to the DNS
poisoning flaw discovered recently
(http://daniel.haxx.se/projects/c-ares/mail/c-ares-archive-2008-07/) while
the ADNS community hasn't (http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MIMG-7ECL5U). 
This is probably a good hint that we should switch.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark 1.0.2win32installer
      • From: Luis EG Ontanon
  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build failure on Linux (GCC 3.4.6)
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark 1.0.2win32installer
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Build failure on Linux (GCC 3.4.6)
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark 1.0.2win32installer
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread

Wireshark and the "fin" logo are registered trademarks of the Wireshark Foundation