ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark 1.0.2win32installer

From: "Jaap Keuter" <jaap.keuter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:30:57 +0200
Hi,

Since the 1.0 release branch is the last one supporting GTK1 we'll need to
keep it alive as long as platforms we support don't have GTK2 support. I'm
weary about feature creep though, so it's a tricky balance.

Thanx,
Jaap  

-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
Sent: 2008-Jul-24 02:23
To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark
1.0.2win32installer



-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För Guy Harris
Skickat: den 24 juli 2008 01:21
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] old wiretap-0.3.1.dll in Wireshark 1.0.2
win32installer


On Jul 23, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote:

>> Wireshark 1.0.2 is a maintenance release of 1.0.0--it is basically 
>> 1.0.0 plus some number of bug fixes (no enhancements and no new 
>> features).  See:
>>
>> http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/ReleaseNumbers
>>
>> for more info.
>>
>> Basically rev 25123 should be in the next non-1.0 release (e.g., 1.2).
Guy Harris wrote:
>
>One person's bug fix is another person's enhancement.
>
>If the extended format trace files are common enough or will be more 
>common in the short term, and if the eyesdn changes aren't too complex, 
>one could perhaps argue that the inability of Wireshark 1.0[.x] to read 
>the extended format trace files is a bug.
>
>(A completely *new* trace file format probably doesn't belong in 
>1.0[.x].  An enhancement to an *existing* trace file format to handle 
>new stuff that will show up within the lifetime of 1.0[.x] might belong 
>in 1.0[.x].)
Which brings up the question what is the expected life time of 1.0[.x]?
and should some (limited) enhancements go in to it?
Regards
Anders
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev