On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:57:19PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> > that I reference quite often, namely
> > http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/Protocol.htm.
>
> The network sorcery pages are a wonderful reference. Our protocol pages
> should be geared more toward how the protocol is dissected in Wireshark.
> How about we put links to the proper Network Sorcery page on each
> Wireshark Wiki page? I don't see a need to duplicate all of the work
> they do.
I do: The information is copyright by a company, we'd like to provide a
free alternative. From their home page:
Our mission statement
To create great software products and valuable network information for
our customers.
So they are in there to their customers, not Wiresharks customers.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
