Riverbed Cascade Pilot Personal Edition: Take Wireshark to the Next Level - Advanced Triggers and Alerts; Web and VoIP Analytics; Long-Term Trending and Forensics; Deep Packet Analysis with Wireshark

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug in SHIM6 control message - UPD REQ and UPD ACK

Date Index Thread Index Other Months All Mailing Lists

Date Prev Date Next Thread Prev Thread Next

From: Sebastien Tandel <sebastien@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:40:15 -0300

Hi,

I've spot it. I will correct it as soon as I have two minutes.

... but it is indeed better to file a bug report :)

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel

On Aug 1, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:

Hi,

Better file a bugreport on that.

Thanx,
Jaap

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 amine.dhraief@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Folks

in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned
number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.

Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the update request
has a value 64 and the update ack 65.

Regards
Amine Dhraief

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Regards,

Sebastien Tandel

References:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug in SHIM6 control message - UPD REQ and UPD ACK
  - From: Jaap Keuter

Prev by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug in SHIM6 control message - UPD REQ and UPD ACK
Next by Date: Re: [Wireshark-dev] question about TCP flag DESEGMENT_UNTIL_FIN
Previous by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug in SHIM6 control message - UPD REQ and UPD ACK
Next by thread: Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug in SHIM6 control message - UPD REQ and UPD ACK
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread