ANNOUNCEMENT: Live Wireshark University & Allegro Packets online APAC Wireshark Training Session
April 17th, 2024 | 14:30-16:00 SGT (UTC+8) | Online

Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Display Issue in Packet Details Pane

From: "Purandhar Krishnamurthy" <purandhar.krishnamurthy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:42:49 -0400 (EDT)
Hi RmKml,

  Yes, Exactly, ethereal is moved to Wireshark. But is there any
possiblity to solve this issue with ethereal-0.10.14 in Linux? I wanted
for this specific version alone.

Thanks,
Purandhar


> Hi Purandhar,
> sorry for email, but you speak on ethereal v0.10.14 ?
> because ethereal moved to wireshark project, and last version on wireshark
> is 0.99.6.
> Best regards
> Rmkml
>
>
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, Purandhar Krishnamurthy wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 09:17:24 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: Purandhar Krishnamurthy
>> <purandhar.krishnamurthy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>> <wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Display Issue in Packet Details Pane
>>
>> Hi all,
>
>     I had compiled and built ethereal-0.10.14 on RHEL Version 3.0. When
> tried to load a capture file, the capture file is completely loaded
> with out any problem. All the fields are properly displayed.
>
>    But when I click on a Protocol layer (say for example UDP) in Packet
> Details pane and then click on Filter-dialogue box, the highlighted
> Protocol Layer in Packet Details pane disappears.
>
> (Actually the problem what i think is, initially the font color is Black,
> when clicked it changes to white with a Blue background color. When
> clicked on filter-dialigue box the blue background color disappears but
> the font color is still white). I can see the Protocol Layer in Packet
> Details when I click again any line in Packet Details or Packet Lists
> pane.
>
> Can anyone please tell me, how it can be solved? Why is this just
> happening in Linux (because i had built the same code in windows also and
> it was working fine) ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Purandhar
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>