Wireshark-dev: Re: [Wireshark-dev] IMS-Information AVP not correctly parsed

From: "Anders Broman" <a.broman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 23:52:50 +0200

Hi,
I have committed the requested changes in revision 22251.
Regards
Anders

-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] För cco
Skickat: den 5 juli 2007 19:48
Till: Developer support list for Wireshark
Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] IMS-Information AVP not correctly parsed

On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 06:22:19PM +0100, Martin Mathieson wrote:
> When enumerated is used it uses 4 bytes for the data...
> 
> From RFC 3588:
> 
> Enumerated
>       Enumerated is derived from the Integer32 AVP Base Format.  The
>       definition contains a list of valid values and their
>       interpretation and is described in the Diameter application
>       introducing the AVP.
> 
> So even if the spec says its Integer32, if we know the valid values
> ane their interpretations, I don't see any harm in doing it as
> Enumerated...?
> 

cristian: yes, you are right; it seems though there are new values used for 
codes which do not appear in the dict (e.g -200). I will try to adapt them 
to the latest defs in the 3gpp spec.

bye now!
cristian
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev