I think I understand... It's sort of like a null-terminated string, but it's
a null-terminated array?
--kan--
--
Kevin A. Noll, KD4WOZ
CCIE, CCDP
Versatile, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wireshark-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 4:18 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED in WLCCP
decode...
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 01:15:35PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
> > So I'm looking at the value strings, and I'm wondering why we should
> > terminate them with {0, NULL} and what happens if one of the value
> > pairs needs to be {0, "a real string"} ?
>
> You can still use 0, "a real string" as one of the entries. You just
> need to have 0, NULL as the final entry. If you don't, the code will
> keep reading past the end and run into random memory space looking for
> that 0, NULL entry.
And one of those overruns might actually cause the crash you were talking
about.
Cia
o Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <jmayer@xxxxxxxxx>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
